Anhelina Kalinina vs Amanda Rodgers Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L L W L
Form
L L L W W L L W L LCara A Cara: Kalinina 2 - 0 Rodgers
Ellas han jugado 4 conjuntos en total, con Kalinina victoriosa 4 y Rodgers victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Kalinina y Rodgers fue en el Jackson, el 04-04-2018, Cuartos de First, Clay, con Anhelina Kalinina obteniendo la victoria 7-5 6-3
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anhelina Kalinina | 2 |
| Amanda Rodgers | 0 |
Jackson(04-04-2018)
7
5
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Amanda Rodgers
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
| 25 | Juegos Ganados | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 8 | Faltas dobles totales | 7 |
| 1:40:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:40:0 |
| 62% (74/119) | % De Primer Servicio | 57% (72/126) |
| 73% (54/74) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 61% (44/72) |
| 49% (22/45) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 35% (19/54) |
| 50% (9/18) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 50% (63/126) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 36% (43/119) |
| 100% (2/2) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (2/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Anhelina Kalinina
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caty McNally
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
18%
(
5 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
51%
(
46 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
97
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Amanda Rodgers
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Amanda Rodgers
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Amanda Rodgers
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (386/228) | Win/Loss | 49% (124/130) |
| 60% (841/554) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (279/284) |
| 54% (6800/5715) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2517/2445) |
| 53% (108/97) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (45/47) |
| 70% (181/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (69/69) |
| 70% (80/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (10/14) |
| 49% (17/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 620 | Aces Total | 150 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1823 | Total Double Faults | 211 |
| 1:14:6 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 412.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 152.4 |
| 65% (19948/30671) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2291/3962) |
| 61% (12179/19948) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1384/2291) |
| 45% (4846/10723) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (759/1671) |
| 50% (2006/4041) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (228/501) |
| 47% (14491/30963) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1785/4045) |
| 45% (25/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (27/28) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (69/64) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (249/100) | Challenger W/L | 44% (67/86) |
| 74% (14/5) | Futures W/L | 57% (57/43) |
| 63% (377/597) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (124/253) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (49/109) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (12/33) |
| 58% (101/174) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (25/56) |
| 88% (376/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (131/110) |
| 12% (376/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (131/21) |
| 23% (238/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (123/14) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
